Liturgical Arts Adventure
Somebody asked me the other day why I don’t like theme parks. I didn’t
think it was a fair question. I think the burden of proof ought to rest
on those of you who are willing to turn over your hard-earned money so
some corporate entity can have the privilege of terrifying you with somersaulting
roller coasters and other death-simulating contraptions.
I do, however, get the urge for an emotional roller-coaster ride about
this time of year. The celebration of the Triduum has enough highs and
lows to send my heart to my throat and stomach to my knees. Every year
I try to make it a little bigger, a little riskier.
Last summer ML called together a group of people who feel the same way
so we could participate in ML’s first Liturgical
Arts Adventure. We took elements of the Triduum and broke them apart
into their separate art forms. The group split up to work onthe various
arts involved in building the Triduum. With the guidance of a few leaders
trained in the liturgical arts, we all took off on our liturgical adventure,
learning more about how liturgies are constructed, how the various arts
support one another in the liturgy, and how liturgy really can be the work
of the people. Our adventure culminated in an Easter Vigil celebration
on the last night that was one of the most moving liturgies I’ve ever been
a part of.
So of course we’re going to do it again. This year’s Liturgical
Arts Adventure will be held in San Diego on July 11–15, 1999. If you
love the Triduum as much as I do, here’s your chance to take a risk and
celebrate it the way you’ve always wanted to.
I’d like to especially invite catechists and religious educators to
participate. While you may not see yourself as the person who builds the
liturgies in your parish, one of the liturgical arts is catechesis for
and about the liturgy. By participating in this adventure, you’ll learn
new skills for breaking open the meaning of the rites for your parishioners.
I hope to see you in San Diego. For more information, see the next page.
Liturgical Catechesis Conference
ML will also be sponsoring its second annual Liturgical
Catechesis Conference this summer.
This conference is more timely than ever with the recent release of
the General Directory for Catechesis. The General Directory for Catechesis,
as many of you know, says that the baptismal catechesis used in the catechumenate
should serve as a model and inspiration for all forms of catechesis. ML’s
Liturgical Catechesis Conference uses the principles of the General Directory
for Catechesis to help liturgists and catechists work together to discover
exactly what liturgical catechesis can look like in a parish. The conference,
which is co-sponsored by the Worship Center in St. Paul, Minn., will be
a blend of input, hands-on tasks, and retreat experiences.
Think about bringing your entire liturgical and catechetical teams,
and learn how to put the vision of the General Directory for Catechesis
into practice in your community.
The dates are August 1–4, 1999.
Musical liturgy
Please welcome Barbara Mount, who takes over as author of “Musical Liturgy”
in the Planning Guide. Barbara is co-founder of LAUDAMUS, a liturgical music
resource and publishing company in San Jose, Calif. The Planning Guide
begins on page 24 of the printed edition of ML.
My heartfelt thanks go out to Diana Kaulback, who had been authoring
“Musical Liturgy” and who has done a splendid job. Diana will continue
to contribute to ML with occasional articles. Look for her piece on wedding
celebrations in next month’s issue.
Speaking of the Planning Guide, I’d like to hear from you about your
experience with it. Do you read all three sections (“Liturgical Spirituality,”
“Shaping the Ritual,” and“Musical Liturgy”) each month? Do you rely on any
one of the sections more than the others? Do you have suggestions for improvements?
Send your comments to me at ML, 160 E. Virginia St. #290, San Jose, CA
95112-5876. Ore-mail me at MdrnLitrgy@aol.com.
Liturgical Lil
Lillian Hamilton does have a few more years on her than some of us, as
will no doubt become clear in this month’s installment (page 39 of the
printed edition of ML). However, she is not senile yet, and she does realize
that Gospel texts are selected from the New Testament and not the Old,
as was reported in her February column. The error was her editor’s.
ML
What do YOU Think?
Send an e-mail to ML Editor
or post an entry on the ML Current Issue
Discussion Board. (All submissions become the property of RPI and may
be edited for length.) |