|
Women and Jesus in Matthew
Those seeking liberating texts for women in the Gospel of Matthew will
need to be patient. The first words spoken by a woman in this Gospel occur
after nearly a third of the story is told. Even more arresting, they are
the words of a woman talking to herself! As noted recently by Bonnie Thurston
in Women in the New Testament (Crossroad: 1998), fewer women appear in
Matthew and fewer are mentioned than in any of the other three Gospels.
Still, one should not make too much of that fact in itself. For this
is a Gospel that takes special delight in how the Kingdom of Heaven begins
in the most unlikely and smallest ways: a tiny seed, a speck of yeast,
a single pearl, a hidden treasure in a vast field. Reading texts relating
to women in Matthew’s Gospel may be like planting one or two seeds in good
soil for yields of a hundredfold. Or hiding a bit of yeast in flour that
can make enough bread to feed a hundred people. Small is exactly how Matthew
envisions the Kingdom of Heaven beginning (13:23,33). For example, the
curtain-opener for Matthew’s story of Jesus is a genealogy filled with
men’s names. But the rare references to four women in the genealogy are
so perplexing and intriguing that they often get the most attention. Scholars
continue to debate their significance since the women seem to represent
an important key to understanding, not just the genealogy, but also the
Gospel itself.
The first healing of a woman in Matthew is Peter’s mother-in-law. Again
Matthew’s text of 8:14-16 is extremely brief. Yet it captures the essence
of Christian life. Jesus saw her lying sick with a fever. He touched her
hand, the fever left her, and she rose and served him. Its all there: death,
resurrection and service to Jesus.
In Mark’s version of this cure, the first four disciples called (Peter,
Andrew, James and John) alert Jesus that she has a fever. After she is
cured, Mark notes that she served them — proof that she was healed. But
Matthew restricts the interchange to the woman and Jesus. No one tells
Jesus about her; he sees her himself, heals her, and is served by her in
response. In Matthew, the cure of Peter’s mother-in-law becomes a story
of discipleship: conversion, healing, and a new life marked by ministry.
The story of Peter’s mother-in-law is brief in both Matthew and Mark. But
two other healing stories of women are dramatically shortened in Matthew
compared to Mark. They involve a ruler whose daughter has just died and
a woman who has suffered a hemorrhage for twelve years. In Mark, the daughter
is identified as being twelve years old, providing a strong connection
between the woman and the girl.
But Matthew omits the girl’s age and compares rather the father who
approached Jesus with authority, asking for his help, and the hemorrhaging
woman who approached Jesus from behind, speaking to herself. In Matthew’s
version, Jesus responded to both the ruler’s request to lay his hands on
his dead daughter so she might live (9:18) and to the woman who touched
the corner of his prayer shawl. Both the father and the woman had faith
in Jesus’ power. The man’s daughter is raised from the dead and the woman
is made whole. But only the woman is lavishly commended by Jesus. “Take
heart, daughter,” he said, “your faith has made you well” (9:22).
In a similar way Matthew draws attention to the young girl herself.
In Mark, Jesus took the child’s father and mother and those with them into
the room where the girl had died (5:40). But in Matthew, only Jesus entered
her room. The focus is on Jesus and the girl. He took her hand and, like
Peter’s mother-in-law, she arose. Hers is the only story of Jesus raising
someone from the dead in Matthew’s Gospel.
In each of these condensed stories, Matthew portrays women in direct
relation to Jesus. No man stands between the women and Jesus or speaks
for them. The women encounter Jesus alone, on their own. Sometimes shorter
texts deliver stronger messages.
ML
Karen A. Barta, Ph.D., is an associate professor of New Testament and
Christian Origins at Seattle University. She is author of The Gospel of
Mark (Glazier: 1988).
What do YOU Think?
Send an e-mail to ML Editor
or post an entry on the ML Current Issue
Discussion Board. (All submissions become the property of RPI and may
be edited for length.) |
|