| A
friend of mine told me of a little jingle he learned from the sister who
taught him in third grade. It goes like this:
Adore
till the Gospel.
Give
thanks till the bell.
Repent
till communion;
Then
all your wants tell.
Sister
did a pretty good job. My friend is now in his sixties and can recite this
little ditty as easily as the Hail Mary or the Pledge of Allegiance. The
apparent purpose of the lesson was the four kinds of prayer: adoration,
thanksgiving, repentance and intercession. What is striking, however, is
that what the children were taught to pray had little to do with the actual
content of the Mass. For many folks, the pre-Vatican II Mass was a kind
of holy background for private prayer, a difference between praying at
Mass and praying the Mass. But they were praying.
Fifteen
years ago I taught a course in liturgy at Saint Louis University. My students
included several women religious, one from Korea; a middle-aged African-American
woman, very much a Baptist who was taking the class because it fit into
her schedule and she was curious about “what you Catholics believe”; a
couple of underpaid, but enthusiastic lay music directors; and a half dozen
seminarians for whom the class was required that year. Quite a mix.
I assigned
a weekly two-page essay and one topic was, “What do you miss from before
Vatican II?” Of course, only the Baptist and the Korean could remember
anything from before 1963, but all of them had ideas of what they
missed. Words used over and over were mystery, awe, beauty, reverence.Some
mentioned incense and chant. A few longed for the clarity of Catholic identity.
One
of the music directors (and I hope he is still in the business) gave his
essay the brilliant title: “What We Miss Shouldn’t Be Missing.” I
thought he summed it up pretty well.
The
work of Vatican II was to restore the liturgy to its original intent: a
profound celebration by all the people of the abiding presence of
God in this world. People would now hear the Scriptures proclaimed in their
own languages, worship with music from their own cultures, celebrate the
holy sacrifice as holy meal in which they participated by holy communion.
We weren’t supposed to lose reverence or beauty or awe. And many communities
haven’t. (And many communities never experienced them even before Vatican
II.)
My
students sensed, and many Catholics young and old still complain, that
while we’ve gained a knowledge of the personal and intimate Jesus, we risk
losing the experience of the transcendent Almighty. While we gained the
act of common worship with our brothers and sisters in Christ, some have
lost the haven of quiet and personal prayer that the Mass used to provide.
And yet those who believe in “both/and” — and I am firmly one of them —
find it difficult to do so much in just an hour on Sunday mornings.
Worship
forms and reflects our idea of God and forms and reflects our answer to
Jesus’ timeless question, “Who do you say that I am?” From the beginning
the pendulum has swung wide on that question. Is Jesus human or is Jesus
divine?
Consider
the conflict between the two great christological schools of Alexandria
and Antioch, a conflict that led to the Council of Nicea in 325. If they
could be transported to our time, the Alexandrian school would be drawn
to the neo-Gothic cathedral in which the architecture speaks of the transcendent.
Their worship would be a contemplation of beauty, of purity. Their music,
the clear voices of a boys’ choir or the organ preludes of Bach. The vestments
are rich. The gestures broad. The sermon, a well-crafted theological treatise.
They celebrate a Jesus who became flesh that we might become like God.
The
folks from Antioch would prefer the Sunday morning equivalent to the coffee-table
Mass. Children might be heard and seen. The music is the rough sound
of untrained voices raised in common hymn, singing with full-throated enthusiasm;
the homily both inspiring to those in pain and an admonition to live justly
in an unjust world. They celebrate a Jesus who came to reveal the goodness
of being fully human, of the holiness of being a beloved creature.
We
need both. We need the Jesus who walked among us as our Emanuel, our God-with-us.
And we need the Jesus who is transfigured on the mountain and ascended
to glory. And we need both festive celebration and profound quiet, beauty
and homeliness.
The
good news is that we don’t have to choose. The bad news is that we too
often force the choice.
In
the history of our worship, when Jesus seemed remote, folks turned to Holy
Mary and the saints. When the Mass was less the prayer of the people and
more the purview of the clergy, the people turned to devotions in which
the language was their own and they could sing their favorite hymns. Now
people are seeking out holy hours, times of quiet contemplation before
the Blessed Sacrament.
One
Sunday Mass each week cannot carry the full weight of our need for prayer.
While the Mass is the cornerstone of our worship lives and the most sublime
expression of our faith, we need other moments of prayer, both private
and communal. The church provides other liturgical expressions: Morning
and Evening Prayer and the communal celebrations of the sacraments of anointing
and reconciliation. We are also encouraged to participate in other kinds
of common prayer: family prayer around the table, Scripture study; prayer
groups and even the more elaborate youth rallies, missions and sacred concerts.
Even
so, the hour on Sunday is often all that people will give or can give.
And it might be best if we seek a “both/and experience” at every Sunday
Mass. Whether the music is accompanied by guitars or organ, led by full
choir or single cantor, attracts primarily teenagers or gray-haired grandparents
— everyone needs to experience the vertical and the horizontal in worship.
Each of us needs to know the divine and the human Jesus.
It
reminds me of words I once found ascribed to G.K. Chesterton: “A heretic
is not one who tells a lie and calls it the truth. A heretic is one who
tells a partial truth and calls it the whole truth.” It would be a great
service to our communities if we could seek to tell as much of the whole
truth about Jesus every Sunday, every time we gather to pray. That’s what
Vatican II was about — restoring some of the lost truth. It was not about
creating liturgy camps who are known by the instruments they play or the
songs they sing or how much incense they use.
If
we ministers answer the question, “Who do you say that I am?” each time
we prepare liturgy, and each time we worship, we won’t lead our people
astray. And we won’t make them choose.
ML
Paige
Byrne Shortal is the pastoral associate at St. Francis Borgia Church in
Washington, Mo. Contact her at pbs@fidnet.com.
What do YOU Think?
Send an e-mail to ML
Editor or post an entry on the ML Current
Issue Discussion Board. (All submissions become the property of RPI
and may be edited for length.) |