|
Risky business
Christianity is risky
business. This is not news; it was risky from the beginning. However challenging
our history has been, we are in a time now when risk is not just inevitable
but necessary. The commitment of baptism implores us not only to follow
where faith may lead us but to lead where we are called. That requires
that we be willing to do more than just accept risk. It demands that we
embrace it, plunging headfirst into the swirling water of conflict and
division. There we are challenged to use the gifts we have been given to
still those waters in the name of the God, for whom the human boundaries
of gender and age and style of worship have no meaning.
This is hard work
when it seems every few months there’s a new restriction on the laity or
a new instruction on ritual, posture, or sung prayer. Taking the risk and
keeping the spirit of renewal alive are ML’s writers in this and every
issue. Kathleen Brown shares her experience and wisdom in forming
lay presiders, recognizing the obstacles to those who aren’t “the priest”
but celebrating the value of those who bring the witness of their lives
to this leadership. Robert VerEecke presents a study of posture
and gesture in liturgy, giving us the tools to process (and perhaps question)
instructions on liturgical posture. John Leonard delves into the
concept of the real presence as manifested in the assembly. Sharing a guided
approach to praying the Triduum, Michael Kwatera offers a way to
challenge those in our communities who perhaps have not yet explored the
richness of the Three Days to a more complete experience. In my own venture
into the realm of risk, I offer some perspectives on discovering authentic
liturgy. With so many odd practices and customs having worked their way
into liturgy, there is certainly reason for documents to restore a better
sense of unity to our celebrations. Some innovations become barriers to
inclusivity and deny the possibility of full participation. Excessive legislation,
though, is not the answer, for when the “rules” of liturgy become so restrictive
that compliance denies the very nature of the celebration, God’s people
are poorly served. “For the liturgy is made up of immutable elements, divinely
instituted, and of elements subject to change. These not only may but ought
to be changed with the passage of time if they have suffered from the intrusion
of anything out of harmony with the inner nature of the liturgy or have
become pointless” (Sacrosanctum Concilium 21). This should apply
not only to our history but to our present and future.ML
What do YOU
Think?
Send an e-mail
to ML Editor or post an entry
on the ML Current Issue Discussion Board. (All
submissions become the property of RPI and may be edited for length.) |
|