Search This Site
  Home
  Browse New Titles
  Browse by Subject
  Browse by Title
  Author Index
  Title Index


  Ministry
   & Liturgy
  Visual Arts Awards

  FREE Ministry
  Resource
  Updates

  Online
  Subscription
  Login

  Software

  Request Print Catalog
  Print Order Form
  Reprint Permission
  Customer Service

  Authors & Writers
  Advertisers
  Bookstores
  Media

  News Releases

  Artists Directory
  Parish Resource
  Directory
  Classified Ads
  Links

  About the Company
  Employment
  Contact Us

  Discussion Forums

The Rite Stuff

Mary Testin

Celebrating “Bread for the World”

There has been considerable concern raised in the last 10 years or so that the faithful are losing our understanding of what Eucharist means for Catholics, particularly regarding the doctrine of Christ’s real presence in the consecrated bread and wine. This concern is not unwarranted — I have actually witnessed communion ministers run back to the sacristy when the hosts were getting low to open bags of unconsecrated hosts to add them to the communion plates. I was able to catch them before this happened and gently remind them that we can only use reserved hosts out of the tabernacle or those consecrated during Mass. Many Catholics no longer understand the concept of real presence and think of the bread and wine as simply memorial symbols, much as Presbyterian Christians believe. Additionally, the weekly Catholic attendance at Eucharist has fallen nationally to a dismal 28 percent. So the late Pope John Paul II had some good reasons for wanting to set aside an entire year devoted to our Catholic understanding of Eucharist. 

There was very good theology at Vatican II about Eucharist as the “source and summit of the Christian life” that calls for the “full and active participation of the people.” It helped us develop much better music over the last 40 years, much of it drawn from Scripture and readily singable for most assemblies. It brought us the three-year Sunday lectionary, Mass texts in the vernacular, cantors, and ministers of both bread and cup. It promoted a greater sense of community. Unfortunately, now there is a trend building in quite the opposite direction. 

The working text of the bishops’ Synod on the Eucharist in Rome reminds the faithful that their role is to contribute “minimal assistance” at Eucharist (sec. 43). How can such a theology support “full and active participation”? There are some church leaders who would like to return communion from the cup to the priest alone. What happened to good baptismal theology? All the faithful should have equal access to both bread and wine as full participants in the Lord’s paschal mystery. To do less is only to reinforce an unhealthy clerical privilege surely not supported in the Gospels. 

Another example of this trend is that, no matter how bad the preaching, Rome insists it must always come from an ordained person, even if it is evident that many gifted laywomen and men have been set aside. It seems to matter little that Christ’s flock is left unfed and that many people no longer attend Eucharist simply because there is nothing there to inspire or challenge.

Our archdiocese distributed a video about the Year of the Eucharist that devoted 10 minutes or so to promoting eucharistic adoration. The only images connecting the Year with Mass were of a priest elevating the host; the participation by the assembly was absent. Where were the exciting examples of Catholics involved in inspiring worship together? Where was the music and preaching that lifts up our hearts? How much more expansive it would have been to reacquaint our people with the four real presences of Christ given to us in the documents of Vatican II: the gathered assembly, the presiding priest, the holy Scriptures, and the consecrated bread and wine. 

I am not trying to denigrate this devotional practice of adoration, but I am concerned about its limitations. What does it say to the rest of the world when our bishops spend so much effort trying to encourage Catholics to adore Christ in bread while 80 percent of our earth community is not getting adequate nutrition? Where is the connection of Eucharist to mission and committing ourselves to feed our hungry sisters and brothers? How is it possible that people are starving to death when so many people profess to be Christian? Isn’t that shameful? Wouldn’t the Year of the Eucharist have been a wonderful opportunity to remind us that, through Eucharist, we too are consecrated and sent out to be bread for the world? It is not enough just to pray for an hour before a bejeweled ostensorium and be content we have given our all. Our faith tradition also demands that we immerse ourselves in the struggle for justice. Prayer must always lead to a commitment to action. The one who teaches us that he is to be found in the least of God’s poor ones will demand a reckoning on the Last Day.  ML

What do YOU Think?
Send an e-mail to ML Editor or post an entry on the ML Current Issue Discussion Board. (All submissions become the property of RPI and may be edited for length.)

| Top |



Search liturgy related sites

Home | Mission Statement | Employment Opportunities
Contact Us | What's New on This Site | Site Guide

Copyright © 1995-2009
Resource Publications | 160 E. Virginia St. #290 | San Jose, CA 95112
888-273-7782 (toll-free) | 408-286-8505 | 408-287-8748 (fax)
www.resourcepublications.com