Re: Crucifix vs. Cross

Posted by Karl on February 12, 2004 at 06:08:46:

In Reply to: Crucifix vs. Cross posted by Babs on February 11, 2004 at 14:29:49:

Crucifix is always required. Fortunately the new GIRM clarifies this for those who mistakenly thought that "crux" in Latin meant "bare cross" in contradistiction to a crucifix (the latter word actually being English, not Latin, hence the confusion).

Replies:

Post a Reply

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: Crucifix is always required. Fortunately the new GIRM clarifies this for those who mistakenly thought that "crux" in Latin meant "bare cross" in contradistiction to a crucifix (the latter word actually being English, not Latin, hence the confusion).

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

---

---

Home | About Resource Publications | Contact us
What's New on This Site | Site Guide
Copyright © 1995–2006 Resource Publications
160 E. Virginia Street #290, San Jose, CA 95112-5876 
E-mail: info@rpinet.com
Toll Free: 888-273-7782,  Phone: 408-286-8505,  Fax: 408-287-8748